United states of america Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff – countertop Defendant – Appellee, v. LANIER LAW, LLC, a Florida liability that is limited, d.b.a. Redstone Law Group, d.b.a. What the law states Offices Of Michael W. Lanier, LIBERTY & TRUST LAW SET OF FLORIDA, LLC, a Florida restricted liability business, Defendants – countertop Claimants, MICHAEL W. LANIER, separately so that as an owner, officer, supervisor, and/or agent regarding the above-mentioned entities, Defendant – countertop Claimant – Appellant, FORTRESS LAW GROUP, LLC, a Florida restricted obligation business, et al., Defendants.
This instance calls for us to think about perhaps the region court correctly awarded summary judgment to your Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on its claims that defendant Michael Lanier violated a few federal statutes and laws regarding the the purchase of home loan support relief solutions. Lanier contends that the region court must not have given summary judgment for all reasons, including that the region court improperly admitted evidence against him, overlooked disputes of material reality, making factual findings in the FTC’s benefit. We conclude that none of the arguments has merit and affirm the region court.
Through Lanier Law, LLC, their attorney, Michael Lanier, a legal professional situated in Jacksonville, Florida, offered mortgage help relief solutions to individuals vulnerable to losing their homes to foreclosure. 1 Lanier along with his affiliates promised homeowners that in exchange for an upfront cost, he’d negotiate less expensive month-to-month home loan repayments, reduced interest levels, and paid off major balances for the kids.
Lanier Law shared a workplace with Rogelio Robles and Edward Rennick, two of Lanier’s co-defendants, whom operated some other entities Pinnacle that is including Legal, Fortress Legal Services, in addition to Department of Loss Mitigation and Forensics (вЂњDOLMFвЂќ) (collectively, the вЂњstaffing agenciesвЂќ).