Just how do the Directive’s new guidelines more particularly subscribe to accountable financing policies in the united kingdom and also the Netherlands?
As happens to be seen, various regulatory choices in these Member States are informed because of the sourced elements of danger that regulators look for to manage, as an example home financial obligation ratios. These alternatives will even colour the way the EU Directive’s accountable financing policy is translated into nationwide laws and regulations. Most likely, the modalities of the policy will continue to be different in one jurisdiction to a different. The following can be observed if we just focus on LTI and LTV ratios as modalities for assessment.
Taking a look at the Netherlands, the way loans are evaluated is regarded as to be an attributing that is important to the low price of defaults on mortgages when you look at the Netherlands. In specific the main focus on LTI as a feature for the creditworthiness evaluation of borrowers is certainly a contribution that is important accountable financing, because it is allowed to be a much better indicator of borrowers’ capacity to repay their loan as compared to LTV evaluation (Kerste et al, p. 28–29). LTI demands are correspondingly strict in Dutch regulation: Fixed ratios are set because of the NIBUD norms together with Temporary guidelines on home loan credit.