Plaintiff had not been the victim of the wrongful or act that is unlawful hazard.
In addition, there’s nothing when you look at the record presented to us to ever establish that plaintiff desired to improve the regards to the contract and had been precluded from doing this, or that defendants’ obligation had been restricted. it appears clear that plaintiff had the ability and capability to see the ordinary language associated with the contract and ended up being fairly apprised as she claims, her ability to vindicate her rights that she was not giving up. Instead, plaintiff was agreeing to really have the chance to vindicate those legal rights within an arbitration and never a court. See Van Syoc v. Walter, 259 N.J.Super. 337 , 339, 613 A.2d 490 (App.Div. 1992) (“when . . . events consent to arbitrate, they truly are deciding on a nonjudicial method of resolving their disputes”, and “it isn’t if the agreement could be assaulted, nevertheless the forum where the assault would be to occur)”, certif.